Straw Dogs – John Gray
A Primate’s Memoir – Robert Sapolsky
The Travels of Ibn Battutah – edited by Tim Mackintosh-Smith
The Willpower Instinct – Kelly McGonigal
Viagem por África – Paul Theroux (Quetzal)
O Sopro das Vozes – Textos de Índios Americanos (Assírio & Alvim)
40 Histórias – Donald Barthelme (Antígona)
Contos IX – Anton Tchekhov (Relógio d’Água)
Crónicas do Mal de Amor – Elena Ferrante (Relógio d’Água)
Ubi Sunt – Manuel de Freitas (Averno)
Geografia Sentimental – Aquilino Ribeiro (Bertrand)
Voici la poésie ce matin – Paulo da Costa Domingos (Averno)
Read Full Post »
Popular hypotheses credit a primordial soup, a bolt of lightning and a colossal stroke of luck. But if a provocative new theory is correct, luck may have little to do with it. Instead, according to the physicist proposing the idea, the origin and subsequent evolution of life follow from the fundamental laws of nature and “should be as unsurprising as rocks rolling downhill.”
From the standpoint of physics, there is one essential difference between living things and inanimate clumps of carbon atoms: The former tend to be much better at capturing energy from their environment and dissipating that energy as heat. Jeremy England, a 31-year-old assistant professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has derived a mathematical formula that he believes explains this capacity. The formula, based on established physics, indicates that when a group of atoms is driven by an external source of energy (like the sun or chemical fuel) and surrounded by a heat bath (like the ocean or atmosphere), it will often gradually restructure itself in order to dissipate increasingly more energy. This could mean that under certain conditions, matter inexorably acquires the key physical attribute associated with life.
“You start with a random clump of atoms, and if you shine light on it for long enough, it should not be so surprising that you get a plant,” England said.
England’s theory is meant to underlie, rather than replace, Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection, which provides a powerful description of life at the level of genes and populations. “I am certainly not saying that Darwinian ideas are wrong,” he explained. “On the contrary, I am just saying that from the perspective of the physics, you might call Darwinian evolution a special case of a more general phenomenon.”
His idea, detailed in a recent paper and further elaborated in a talk he is delivering at universities around the world, has sparked controversy among his colleagues, who see it as either tenuous or a potential breakthrough, or both.
Read Full Post »